Had the Anaconda Plan been followed, Union victory would almost certainly not have occurred. Scott called for a strong defense of Washington, D.C., a blockade of the Confederacy's Atlantic and Gulf coasts, and a. president Abraham Lincoln at the start of the Civil War. Time was on the side of the Confederates, and Scott’s Anaconda Plan played into this advantage. Elliott of Cincinnati, pokes fun at the war plan Union general-in-chief Winfield Scott submitted to U.S. It was this sustained forward movement, not external pressure, which defeated the South. However, the Federals went on the offensive, eventually on all fronts at the same time. Union forces did capture control of the Mississippi River,and the Confederacy was encircled. The Anaconda Plan did not envision an attack into the South, Scott believing that waiting out the Confederates would bring victory yet prevent post-war hard feelings. Scott called for the Federals to encircle the Confederacy and then wait for it to die. The 47-day Siege of Vicksburg eventually gave control of the Mississippi Rivera critical supply lineto the Union, and was part of the Union’s successful Anaconda Plan to cut off all trade. However, they neglect an important consideration. Some historians argue that this was the way the Civil War was fought. Scott responded on May 3, that such a campaign would be difficult to achieve and instead suggested another approach, the so-called “Anaconda Plan”: a blockade of ocean ports and capture of the Mississippi River, thus encircling the Confederacy like a giant snake and squeezing it to death. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for THE ANACONDA PLAN Winfield Scotts Naval Blockade Civil War STORY AMERICA CARD at the best. On April 27, McClellan suggested a trans-montagne (over the Appalachian Mountains)campaign from Ohio against Richmond. From the beginning, both sides knew the importance of controlling the waterways. After the firing on Fort Sumter on April 15, 1861, both the Union and the Confederacy began building both strong armies and navies. After Fort Sumter surrendered on April 13, 1861, he only acted when a brash young army officer named George B. As seen at the Battle of Fort Henry, the navy played an important role in the Civil War. Like so many others, he did not want to believe it would happen. Yet this hero of the War of 1812, the 1830s nullification crisis, and the Mexican War did not live up to his reputation when the Civil War began There is little evidence that he had begun any serious strategic planning for the conflict.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |